Sermon 18th October 2009
Today, one of our Lay Readers, Adrian Parkhouse preaches based on the reading from Romans 6:1-14
“…just as Christ was raised from the dead…we too may live a new life.”
1. Is there a “young idealist” in the house?
“Who am I looking for?” Is suppose a visionary; someone who cherishes ideas which are lofty and romantic, ideas that are positive and constructive; someone one looking forward with optimism and purpose. Perhaps the sort of person who would have been in Cameron’s midnight beach party 25 years ago “setting the world aright” (see last week’s sermon).
And I only said “young” as I rather assumed that someone like this was more likely to be found among the younger folk than among us oldies, whom years of experience have hardened into cynical realism (– or is that just me?).
I ask the question because I came across the notes of a young idealist this week – notes made perhaps 30/35 years ago in an unstructured way but which nonetheless provide an insight into the thinking of the breed – these “idealists”.
They are notes in this book – a bible – and comprise occasional marginal jottings, but more often underlining in several colours, some more heavily emphasised than others; notes made over a period of time. And as I say, together you can piece together what may have been driving this particular “religious idealist”. One strong theme emerges from the heavy underlining of these diverse passages:
“..we teach everyone we can so that, if possible, we may bring very man up to his full maturity in Christ Jesus.” (Col 1:29)
“The ultimate aim of the Christian ministry is to produce the love which springs from a pure heart, good conscience and genuine faith….” (1Tim: 15)
“His gifts were made…that the whole body might be built up until the time comes when we arrive at real maturity – that measure of development which is meant by the “fullness of Christ”” (Eph 4:13)
An idealist then, who is expects their faith to have an ultimate aim, and the promise of producing love, maturity and fullness.
2. We continue our study of Paul’s letter to the Christians in Rome. We have come to chapter 6 which means that, in our recent studies, a fortnight ago John took us through Paul’s teaching on how our being put right with God depended entirely on the grace of God and the sacrifice of Jesus – and not on anything we could or can achieve ourselves; and last week Cameron led us though the “breather” that is chapter 5, as Paul drew together various strands of the meaning of our being justified – emphasising the consequences of peace, hope and joy (joy even in our troubles). [I pause here just to note that in chapter 5, our Idealist has a line in the margin of vvs 4 and 5, “these things will give us patient endurance [which] will develop a mature character…”].
The start of chapter 6 marks the start of a new theme in Paul’s teaching – some have called it a “right turn”: he has explained “justification” and he now moves on to “sanctification”. Our Idealist wouldn’t favour that word: they haven’t, but they might have preferred to mark the phrase which comes up at various points in various translations: “live our new life”. I think the Idealist would want to have emphasised the point that Paul is beginning to teach his readers about living the Christian life – and in particular about the differences between that life and the life they would lived before they knew the peace and hope and joy that Christ has brought.
3. This is the theme that will see out our study of the letter over the next few weeks – as we edge towards the crescendo that is Paul’s teaching of a life lived under the influence of the Holy Spirit in chapter 8. In these early verses, his concern is to explain how the new life is marked by an entirely different view of our relationship to temptation and to sin. He starts by taking a conclusion that may have been drawn by cynical logic from the fact that it is faith, not good behaviour, which brings peace with God: the conclusion posed is: OK then, if behaviour is not important, let’s put “peace with God” in the bag and carry on behaving just as we used to! No, says Paul: wrong conclusion. Wrong conclusion because what we are describing here is a relationship, not a tick-box qualification. You were not saved, justified, reconciled to God by saying “I have faith”: you were saved because, however imperfectly, however poorly you may have able to describe it, you understood who God was and what he had done – because you took the first step on a relationship-path, which involved sharing and the start of understanding.
Here Paul dwells on the shared experience of dying and being raised to something new; he draws in the experience of baptism, describing the ducking as sharing Jesus’ death, only to be able to be raised to something entirely new. “Sharing Jesus’ death”. There is a thought – not I think something I have previously considered. On Good Friday, in your meditations, where do you see yourself: with Mary and the disciples watching from the crowd; or sharing Jesus’ place on the cross? Paul suggests that both are places we occupy. And I read this this week: “There is a great difference between realising “On that cross he was crucified for me” and “On that cross I am crucified with Him.” The one aspect brings in deliverance from sin’s condemnation, the other deliverance from sin’s power”.
4. Paul is clear: the new life is a life for good, for righteousness, lived “under grace”. The Christian is intended to be wary of the power of wrong, of sin – to avoid it, to “put ourselves in God’s hands as weapons for good”. To him it can not be any other way: the old is dead and gone - elsewhere he speaks of our having laid it aside (Eph 4:22), of our having “God’s nature…for good” in us and so our being incapable of habitually doing wrong (1 Jn 3:6ff).
5. Another passage heavily underlined by our Idealist was from I Cor 4: “For the kingdom of God is not a matter of a spate of words but the power of Christian living.” I not apologise that the preachers in recent weeks have used words like “justification” and ”sanctification”: they can be helpful shorthand. But the Kingdom of God is not about words, suggests the Idealist, it is about the power of Christian living – it is about spiritual maturity, about love from a pure heart, about working towards the “fullness of Christ” - those other aspects of which Paul’s teaching which deserved to be underlined.
6. It is a strange thing, revisiting your past. Photographs show something of you. Flipping through this old bible of mine has reminded me of something else: how I longed for my faith to bring me to the point where, never mind the words (and the Lord knows, I love words), my life might reflect the power of the Kingdom of God. Idealistic, romantic, hopeless? You are better placed to judge the ageing cynic who had emerged from the idealism of youth? And believe me I know (some at least) of my faults.
But I am pleased to recognise what I glimpsed then; to re-affirm that vision as the vision that drives me still; to pick it up, to run with it; to thank God that we do live a new life, shared with Christ; to thank Him that I know that we are freed from power of sin and that the relationship we enjoy is drawing us to maturity and love.
Any more aging Idealists in the house?
“…just as Christ was raised from the dead…we too may live a new life.”
1. Is there a “young idealist” in the house?
“Who am I looking for?” Is suppose a visionary; someone who cherishes ideas which are lofty and romantic, ideas that are positive and constructive; someone one looking forward with optimism and purpose. Perhaps the sort of person who would have been in Cameron’s midnight beach party 25 years ago “setting the world aright” (see last week’s sermon).
And I only said “young” as I rather assumed that someone like this was more likely to be found among the younger folk than among us oldies, whom years of experience have hardened into cynical realism (– or is that just me?).
I ask the question because I came across the notes of a young idealist this week – notes made perhaps 30/35 years ago in an unstructured way but which nonetheless provide an insight into the thinking of the breed – these “idealists”.
They are notes in this book – a bible – and comprise occasional marginal jottings, but more often underlining in several colours, some more heavily emphasised than others; notes made over a period of time. And as I say, together you can piece together what may have been driving this particular “religious idealist”. One strong theme emerges from the heavy underlining of these diverse passages:
“..we teach everyone we can so that, if possible, we may bring very man up to his full maturity in Christ Jesus.” (Col 1:29)
“The ultimate aim of the Christian ministry is to produce the love which springs from a pure heart, good conscience and genuine faith….” (1Tim: 15)
“His gifts were made…that the whole body might be built up until the time comes when we arrive at real maturity – that measure of development which is meant by the “fullness of Christ”” (Eph 4:13)
An idealist then, who is expects their faith to have an ultimate aim, and the promise of producing love, maturity and fullness.
2. We continue our study of Paul’s letter to the Christians in Rome. We have come to chapter 6 which means that, in our recent studies, a fortnight ago John took us through Paul’s teaching on how our being put right with God depended entirely on the grace of God and the sacrifice of Jesus – and not on anything we could or can achieve ourselves; and last week Cameron led us though the “breather” that is chapter 5, as Paul drew together various strands of the meaning of our being justified – emphasising the consequences of peace, hope and joy (joy even in our troubles). [I pause here just to note that in chapter 5, our Idealist has a line in the margin of vvs 4 and 5, “these things will give us patient endurance [which] will develop a mature character…”].
The start of chapter 6 marks the start of a new theme in Paul’s teaching – some have called it a “right turn”: he has explained “justification” and he now moves on to “sanctification”. Our Idealist wouldn’t favour that word: they haven’t, but they might have preferred to mark the phrase which comes up at various points in various translations: “live our new life”. I think the Idealist would want to have emphasised the point that Paul is beginning to teach his readers about living the Christian life – and in particular about the differences between that life and the life they would lived before they knew the peace and hope and joy that Christ has brought.
3. This is the theme that will see out our study of the letter over the next few weeks – as we edge towards the crescendo that is Paul’s teaching of a life lived under the influence of the Holy Spirit in chapter 8. In these early verses, his concern is to explain how the new life is marked by an entirely different view of our relationship to temptation and to sin. He starts by taking a conclusion that may have been drawn by cynical logic from the fact that it is faith, not good behaviour, which brings peace with God: the conclusion posed is: OK then, if behaviour is not important, let’s put “peace with God” in the bag and carry on behaving just as we used to! No, says Paul: wrong conclusion. Wrong conclusion because what we are describing here is a relationship, not a tick-box qualification. You were not saved, justified, reconciled to God by saying “I have faith”: you were saved because, however imperfectly, however poorly you may have able to describe it, you understood who God was and what he had done – because you took the first step on a relationship-path, which involved sharing and the start of understanding.
Here Paul dwells on the shared experience of dying and being raised to something new; he draws in the experience of baptism, describing the ducking as sharing Jesus’ death, only to be able to be raised to something entirely new. “Sharing Jesus’ death”. There is a thought – not I think something I have previously considered. On Good Friday, in your meditations, where do you see yourself: with Mary and the disciples watching from the crowd; or sharing Jesus’ place on the cross? Paul suggests that both are places we occupy. And I read this this week: “There is a great difference between realising “On that cross he was crucified for me” and “On that cross I am crucified with Him.” The one aspect brings in deliverance from sin’s condemnation, the other deliverance from sin’s power”.
4. Paul is clear: the new life is a life for good, for righteousness, lived “under grace”. The Christian is intended to be wary of the power of wrong, of sin – to avoid it, to “put ourselves in God’s hands as weapons for good”. To him it can not be any other way: the old is dead and gone - elsewhere he speaks of our having laid it aside (Eph 4:22), of our having “God’s nature…for good” in us and so our being incapable of habitually doing wrong (1 Jn 3:6ff).
5. Another passage heavily underlined by our Idealist was from I Cor 4: “For the kingdom of God is not a matter of a spate of words but the power of Christian living.” I not apologise that the preachers in recent weeks have used words like “justification” and ”sanctification”: they can be helpful shorthand. But the Kingdom of God is not about words, suggests the Idealist, it is about the power of Christian living – it is about spiritual maturity, about love from a pure heart, about working towards the “fullness of Christ” - those other aspects of which Paul’s teaching which deserved to be underlined.
6. It is a strange thing, revisiting your past. Photographs show something of you. Flipping through this old bible of mine has reminded me of something else: how I longed for my faith to bring me to the point where, never mind the words (and the Lord knows, I love words), my life might reflect the power of the Kingdom of God. Idealistic, romantic, hopeless? You are better placed to judge the ageing cynic who had emerged from the idealism of youth? And believe me I know (some at least) of my faults.
But I am pleased to recognise what I glimpsed then; to re-affirm that vision as the vision that drives me still; to pick it up, to run with it; to thank God that we do live a new life, shared with Christ; to thank Him that I know that we are freed from power of sin and that the relationship we enjoy is drawing us to maturity and love.
Any more aging Idealists in the house?