Sermon 26th April 2015
Today, one of our Lay Readers, Adrian Parkhouse, continues our study of the Gospel of Mark.
The reading is from Mark 1:21-34
THE HEALING TEACHER
“The Son of Man came not be served but to
serve and to give his life as a ransom for many” Mk 10:45
Within a thick and spreading hawthorn bush
That overhung a molehill large and round,/
I heard from morn to morn a merry thrush
Sing hymns to sunrise,/ and I drank the sound
With joy;/ and often,/ an intruding guest,/
I watched her secret toil from day to day -
How true she warped the moss to form a nest,
And modelled it within with wood and clay;/
And by and by, like heath-bells gilt with dew,
There lay her shining eggs,/ as bright as flowers,
Ink-spotted over shells of greeny blue;/
And there I witnessed, in the sunny hours,
A brood of nature's minstrels chirp and fly,
Glad as the sunshine and the laughing sky.
That overhung a molehill large and round,/
I heard from morn to morn a merry thrush
Sing hymns to sunrise,/ and I drank the sound
With joy;/ and often,/ an intruding guest,/
I watched her secret toil from day to day -
How true she warped the moss to form a nest,
And modelled it within with wood and clay;/
And by and by, like heath-bells gilt with dew,
There lay her shining eggs,/ as bright as flowers,
Ink-spotted over shells of greeny blue;/
And there I witnessed, in the sunny hours,
A brood of nature's minstrels chirp and fly,
Glad as the sunshine and the laughing sky.
Where I grew
up, John Clare was our local poet.
Stories were told to us in school of how in his later years, after he
had reached the peak of his fame as the Peasant Poet, noted for simple
descriptions of the countryside of his native east Northants, he used to be
seen walking along the paths that became the Billing Road, on his way to take
up his usual place sat in the portico of All Saints Church in the centre of the
town. That was a century before I walked
some of the same route on my way to school, but the countryside was very close
and we could still find what had so enraptured him.
And my walk
took me past the gates of the place from which his daily walks began: for me, St Andrews Hospital; for John Clare, The Northampton County Asylum.
We continue
our reading of Mark’s gospel. Last week
we heard the message of the closeness of the Kingdom of God and the need to
repent; and the call to the
fishermen: “Follow me” and they
did. This week we see the start of
Jesus’ ministry. And straightaway we are
drawn into the paradox that is Jesus – the paradox that is summed-up in our
theme verse from Mark 10: that the Son
of Man (which is a term that has generated a ton of theological theory – but is
at the very least a title that identifies Jesus with suffering and with
greatness) came not to be served but to serve:
the strong serving the weak. And
in our passage this morning that paradox emerges from its twin, interwoven
themes: authority and compassion.
The
challenge of Jesus’ authority has already emerged – though unspoken. Why did those men leave their nets, their
boats, their families and follow? What was it about this man that so effected
them? The questions intrigue us. We find it difficult to imagine how it could
have happened, why and how they could just have got up and gone. It so unreal to where we find ourselves,
bound up in our complex lives, dependent on so much and so many dependent on
us. Footnote 1: Did you see the press
coverage this week about the increased numbers of people (still small) joining
religious orders? I was struck by one
new nun’s comment that the religious life offered her the freedom she felt she
needed to serve God fully. She might
have explained – to respond to his authority, to follow.
Today this theme
of authority becomes explicit: Jesus’
teaching wasn’t like the scribes’, the teachers of the Law, because “he taught with authority”. The evil spirit was expelled because “this man has authority to give orders to
evil spirits and they obey him.”
What had
Mark noticed among the worshippers in the synagogue? As on the lakeside, what was it about this
man that was so strikingly authoritative?
We could answer that from Jesus’ perspective: while we have saved Mark’s account of Jesus’
baptism by John until later in the series, that experience of heaven opening,
the Spirit’s descent and the words of authorisation, You are my own dear Son. I am
pleased with you, marked the authority that Jesus felt. On another occasion, John reports Jesus being
challenged outright about his teaching: Jesus answered, “What I
teach is not my own teaching, but it comes from God, who sent me.” (Jn 7:16). He speaks of what
he has seen and heard with the Father.
That is how Jesus accounted for his authority. But that is not why it would have struck the
listeners in such a way. From their
perspective, the authority lay in part in the contrast with the scribes. The scribes had a formulaic way of teaching: they started with the Torah and then took and
compared the opinions of conflicting scholars of how the Law was to be applied
in everyday life. It was close to
lawyers arguing case law before a judge.
But Jesus went to the heart of the matter – in ways which explained not
how the Law was to be dissected in a descending order of detail, but rather,
looking upwards, at why the Law was
given as a means of enabling God’s people to respond to His grace. We do not know what he preached that day (Cf Luke 4:17ff ”The spirit of the Lord is upon me …”), but we will
see plenty of his teaching in this series and we can imagine the thrill of
hearing, not a debate about the minutiae of behaviour, but an exhortation that
how we are and what we do is significant if the Kingdom of God is here! And the Kingdom of God is here.
Cynical though
we are, critics that we are encouraged to be, nonetheless, we, like that
synagogue crowd, crave to hear a voice of authority. Stripping away the veneer of our independence,
each of us longs to hear the truth; not because it is something forced on us, certainly
not because we will like it, but because it is something of authority that we can
decide for ourselves to follow; something in which we can invest – or start to
the search for - that part of ourselves that is the “real” us. In some ways, we should like to be children
again – not for the innocence, that cannot be restored, but for the natural
trust that children have. What did Jesus
say? Unless
you accept the kingdom of God like a little child …” (Mk 10:15) . We would like help in the search for, what
perhaps we call “meaning”, in our lives.
I think that was the authority of Jesus they saw that day.
What of the
other theme: compassion? For Mark the first “healing” is not the
expulsion of the evil spirit it seems, but the quieter, private events
surrounding the cure of Simon’s mother-in-law.
But the handling of man in the synagogue and the other exorcisms
recorded in our reading must have been acts, not only used to advertise Jesus’
authority over evil (the first theme) but also acts of healing and so
compassion. William Barclay in his
commentary wisely suggests that we can approach these accounts as either being
literal, or as being symbolic or as being real in the terms understood at the
time. While I do believe in a power of
evil, I favour the last of these alternatives and so for me I am struck that,
for Mark, Jesus’ first act of compassion, if not healing, is exercised in
respect of a condition that we might now describe as being a mental one (the
description is much the same as the insane man in the Gerasene country: ch.5).
To preach on
mental illness is beyond me. It would
require a sensitivity that I lack and, if already, you are concerned, forgive
me. The Bible deals very sensitively and
honestly with many forms of illness, including those we term
psychological. Whatever I say will be
too simplistic. Forgive me.
The
statistics tell us that a significant proportion of the population and so those
in church this morning, are impacted in some way by mental illness. My own experience bears out the figures: I share the powerlessness and fear that
conditions of mental illness can induce in myself and those I love. And history shows us that society’s
incomprehension and inability to respond has frequently led to exclusion and
even incarceration. We live in more
enlightened times and it is a matter of pride that our parish sits so close to
a leading caring institution which is the Maudsley and a matter of rejoicing
that so many people within our churches are individually engaged in caring for,
curing or campaigning for the mentally ill.
From these enlightened times we look back and realise how sometimes the
very illness which threatened exclusion may have created greatness. John Clare is just one very small
example: another close to me was the
priest and translator, JB Phillips. And,
without romanticising the real pain, the list of composers and artists is a
long one and it continues to be written:
as the experience they, we, have may bring its own glimpses of
fullness. Which is one reason why
exclusion is wrong.
As a matter
of history, western societies used the resources left behind by the
disappearance of leprosy (and we gospel readers love a good leprosy story – one
next week!) to incarcerate those whose reason it doubted. As one excluded class went, it was replaced
by another. Footnote 2: Watching the news reports this week of the
deaths in the Mediterranean, I wondered whether we were now ready to create
another class of “the excluded”. It is
not just the attitudes expressed, not just the camps on the edges of towns, but
I was reminded too of the “Ships of Fools” which in the Middle Ages used to
carry the mentally ill along the great waterways of Europe, from city to city –
never reaching home .
The point is
that Jesus went straight for the jugular:
no hiding behind cultural nicety, his culture or ours. He healed equally: equal respect, equal treatment, equal
love. Why? Because, Mark seems to want to understand at
the outset, whatever we may think – and even when think it about ourselves – we
are all the same in the sight of the Father, no matter what. And His love shown
in the compassion of Jesus is equally given.
Authority
and compassion. Meaning and inclusion. That is what you would have experienced had
you heard him that Sabbath. Read the
passage again and see if his words don’t reach you still?
I am: yet what I am none cares or knows,
My friends forsake me like a memory lost;
I long for scenes where man has never trod;
A place where woman never smil'd or wept;
There to abide with my creator, God,
And sleep as I in childhood sweetly slept:
Untroubling and untroubled where I lie;
The grass below--above the vaulted sky.